Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts

Monday, April 5, 2010

Happy Resurrection Day!

I intend to get started on a series of posts that explain evidence for the Resurrection of the Jewish Messiah, the King of kings, the Lord of all,Yeshua of Nazareth, later this week.  I am not sure how many parts it will have, but I have a few ideas rolling around in my noodle.  One problem and obstacle will be my schoolwork that is due Tuesday, but I can usually find some time to extemporaneously write a bit.

But first, I wanted to pass on something from smart Christians.  I LOVE smart Christians; there is just something about using the tools that the modern world believes it owns and showing that the most plausible explanation for what we actually observe in world is from a loving God.  Here is an article from Seed magazine about the theological implications of a multiverse.  Essentially, the multiverse--describing exactly what it sounds like--is a philosophical and metaphysical proposition that is more common nowadays, intended to account for, among other things--like obvious design in nature--the beginning of the Universe, (i.e. the Big Bang...since, as Greg Koukl often says, "a Big Bang needs a Big Banger").  A sort-of review of astrophysicist Jeff Zweerink's booklet is included within the post.  I thought it was a well written article, engaging and insightful.  Enjoy!

An excerpt (Zweerink speaking):
“As my understanding of multiverse models increased, I realized the whole issue provided a tremendous opportunity to engage science-minded people and draw them into discussion of the Gospel.” Zweerink hopes to convince fellow Christians that multiverse only replaces one design problem with another, strengthening the evidence of god. “It seems that any multiverse model which can explain our observable universe requires a beginning and still exhibits design,” he says. Zweerink has also devoted a monthly blog post on reasons.org to the theological advantages of multiverse theory.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

What are Universals?

I now write on what I believe to be the most defective point to the philosophical position of the Biblical skeptic.  This is certainly not original with me; yea, it has been consistently promoted throughout the 20th Century where those putting forth the idea pointed rearwards to centuries prior and claimed to have read others, like Blaise Pascal, promote the very concept.  Well, Pascal himself wrote in regards to the idea, "In what I am writing, let no one think I am saying anything new." That this point has not been disproven to this day--the same line of reasoning, the same clear idea, the same consistent thought--speaks to the power and simplicity to the argument itself.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Mona Lisa Eyes

Lately, I have been compelled to engage Atheism more than usual. Either I am reading up on the latest 'findings' by prominent purveyors of pessimism or I am arguing for basic blocks of Reality with folks/friends/foes on Facebook. I find that this actually serves two functions for the Christian: